Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lemar's 5th Studio Album
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:08, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Lemar's 5th Studio Album (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod, removed without explanation. Original deletion proposal by Disolveinarow (talk · contribs) because "Not an album yet released". Prod endorsed by myself for the following reason:
Per WP:NSONGS: "Separate articles should not be created until there is sufficient reliably sourced information about a future release. For example, a future album whose article is titled "(Artist)'s Next Album" and consists solely of blog or fan forum speculation about possible titles, or songs that might be on the album, is a WP:CRYSTAL violation and should be discussed only in the artist's article, and even then only if there is some verifiable information about it."
A few changes have been made since the deletion proposal but they don't seem to address the concerns. Adambro (talk) 17:38, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - way too early for a WP article, as sources cannot even agree on what year the album will be released. The nominator is correct about WP: SONGS, also applicable are WP: CRYSTAL and WP: HAMMER. The editors behind this article should realize that there is nothing wrong with exercising patience until the album becomes a reality. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:52, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:54, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - It's waaaaay too early. Plus, with the usual things that I look for in this type of page - i.e. tracklisting, name and release date - all missing, bring on the
wallhammer!!! DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 19:57, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply] - Delete Too early per WP:HAMMER. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:07, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per WP:CRYSTAL. Joe Chill (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete This album doesn't even have a title, that there is enough for deletion; aside from that, two contradicting release dates within the article, no track listing and very little significant coverage in independent reliable sources. --Volbeatfan (talk) 04:10, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Lots of hammering these days. Shadowjams (talk) 08:20, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above. This fails WP:NALBUMS; WP:CRYSTAL and WP:HAMMER apply. Gongshow Talk 20:13, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.